Message130714
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Trundle, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, loewis, neologix, nvetoshkin, pitrou, socketpair, terry.reedy, torsten |
| Date |
2011年03月12日.23:47:23 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.7166025e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1299973641.3702.122.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1299973501.23.0.232711689178.issue11406@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I would like to have an iterator version as well, but I also dislike
> another function (especially the "x" prefix). How about adding a
> keyword argument to select iterator behaviour?
Changing the return type based on an argument is generally frown upon
so, if anything, I think it would be better to have a separate function
(whatever its name). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年03月12日 23:47:24 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, terry.reedy, giampaolo.rodola, eric.araujo, Trundle, brian.curtin, torsten, nvetoshkin, neologix, socketpair |
| 2011年03月12日 23:47:23 | pitrou | link | issue11406 messages |
| 2011年03月12日 23:47:23 | pitrou | create |
|