Message130291
| Author |
neologix |
| Recipients |
neologix, sable |
| Date |
2011年03月07日.20:53:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.2006887e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<AANLkTi=E675UOiUCyc6pc=heYfPx7=dfkCSGA65xaJiN@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1299492932.61.0.0861363966012.issue11185@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> wait4 without WNOHANG works fine. waitpid works fine even with WNOHANG.
> I don't know which workaround is the better.
As far as the test is concerned, it's of course better to use wait4
without WNOHANG in a test names test_wait4 (especially since waitpid
is tested elsewhere)... |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年03月07日 20:53:54 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, sable |
| 2011年03月07日 20:53:53 | neologix | link | issue11185 messages |
| 2011年03月07日 20:53:53 | neologix | create |
|