Message129965
| Author |
neologix |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.smith, neologix, pitrou |
| Date |
2011年03月03日.12:59:08 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.7701935e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1299157148.89.0.97600358972.issue11382@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Do you want to propose a patch?
Sure, if removing those calls to Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS/Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS seems reasonable (I might haved missed something obvious).
Just to be clear, I'm not at all criticizing the current GIL implementation, there's been a great work done on it.
I'm just saying that releasing and re-acquiring the GIL around fast syscalls is probaly not a good idea. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年03月03日 12:59:09 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, eric.smith |
| 2011年03月03日 12:59:08 | neologix | set | messageid: <1299157148.89.0.97600358972.issue11382@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年03月03日 12:59:08 | neologix | link | issue11382 messages |
| 2011年03月03日 12:59:08 | neologix | create |
|