Message129883
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Aaron.Sherman, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, neologix, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年03月02日.12:27:54 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00022340337 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1299068874.96.0.0103788124421.issue11314@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Benchmark under 3.x (without obsolete patch):
- fork + execv + waitpid: 4794.4 ms
- os.popen: 19792.9 ms
- subprocess.popen: 10152.1 ms
Benchmark under 2.x (without patch:)
- fork + execv + waitpid: 4292.7 ms
- os.popen: 12697.6 ms
- subprocess.popen: 5496.3 ms
Looks like there's a regression on both os.popen and subprocess.popen. |
|