Message129806
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
alexandre.vassalotti, belopolsky, cool-RR, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, exarkun, hinsen, lemburg, loewis, obamausa8, pitrou, rhettinger |
| Date |
2011年03月01日.21:08:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.615634e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1299013726.3709.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1299013399.37.0.8184603845.issue9276@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> To have a non-hackish patch we need a non-hackish idea. The
> `.__parent_class__` idea looks hackish to me, but now that I think
> about it, how is it more hackish than a function's `.__module__`
> attribute?
Not much, agreed. You might want to call it `__namespace__` instead if
you want it to look cleaner :)
(and it could be useful for other purposes such as e.g. introspection)
But by "hackish" I meant the possible implementation of it, not the idea
itself. That's what a patch would help assess. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年03月01日 21:08:50 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, lemburg, loewis, rhettinger, hinsen, exarkun, belopolsky, alexandre.vassalotti, eric.araujo, obamausa8, daniel.urban, cool-RR |
| 2011年03月01日 21:08:49 | pitrou | link | issue9276 messages |
| 2011年03月01日 21:08:49 | pitrou | create |
|