Message128790
| Author |
ysj.ray |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, ezio.melotti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, ron_adam, vstinner, ysj.ray |
| Date |
2011年02月18日.15:38:51 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.2723e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1298043533.94.0.788213366537.issue7330@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Can you add tests for "%.s"? I would like to know if "%.s" is different than "%s" :-)
Oh sorry~~ I made an mistake. There is no bug here. I have attached tests that show that '%.s' is the same as '%s'.
Here is the updated patch:
1, changed the function name unicode_format() to
1, remove
"""
- "must be a sequence, not %200s",
+ "must be a sequence, not %.200s",
"""
in Python/ceval.c
2, Removing using PySequence_GetSlice() in unicode_format_align() and do a refactor to optimize the process.
3, Add tests for '%.s' and '%s', as haypo wanted.
This is obviously not the final patch just convenient for other to do a review. Something more need to be discussed. |
|