Message127818
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, pitrou, scoder |
| Date |
2011年02月03日.20:20:16 |
| SpamBayes Score |
6.6278894e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1296764413.3925.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1296762537.96.0.525531898123.issue11107@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Hmm, ok, but AFAICT, your patch was rejected rather because of the way
> it approached the problem, not so much because of the issue itself.
I would be rather for the patch myself. The bytecode currently generated
for sliced indexing is awfully suboptimal.
> Plus, the fact that Python 3 requires slices in more places than
> Python 2 (which had the lower level getslice protocol) makes this a
> bigger issue now than it was three years ago.
True. |
|