Message127340
| Author |
glyph |
| Recipients |
barry, doko, eric.araujo, fwierzbicki, georg.brandl, glyph, lemburg, michael.foord, ned.deily, pitrou, r.david.murray, ronaldoussoren, tarek |
| Date |
2011年01月28日.20:31:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.2241301e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1296246701.29.0.457970913838.issue7175@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I would still prefer ~/.local/something-parallel-to-where-it's-usually-installed for its ease of documentation. But ~/.python/X.Y isn't terribly objectionable.
A minor point about Michael Foord's fallback proposal: I don't know why everyone is so keen to stuff things into ~/Library on the mac, but dotfiles don't go in ~/Library/Preferences. While that directory isn't exclusively populated with plist files, it's pretty close. If you want to try for consistency with platform convention, 'org.python.distutils.cfg' would be a better name for it, but I've never hand-edited a text file in that directory either and I get the impression one isn't meant to.
But, since framework builds of Python already has ~/Library/Python/X.Y directories that they look in for other things, that location should probably be recycled if one wishes to have a fallback. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011年01月28日 20:31:41 | glyph | set | recipients:
+ glyph, lemburg, barry, georg.brandl, doko, ronaldoussoren, pitrou, tarek, fwierzbicki, ned.deily, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord |
| 2011年01月28日 20:31:41 | glyph | set | messageid: <1296246701.29.0.457970913838.issue7175@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011年01月28日 20:31:40 | glyph | link | issue7175 messages |
| 2011年01月28日 20:31:40 | glyph | create |
|