Message127315
| Author |
daniel.urban |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, daniel.urban, georg.brandl, pwerneck, rodsenra, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2011年01月28日.16:30:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.189898e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1296232253.32.0.787989656278.issue1294232@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
It seems, that this possible problem already came up when __build_class__ got implemented, see issue1681101. The second and third version of the patch at this issue (file7874 and file7875) contains a comment: "XXX Should we do the "winner" calculation here?". But the next version, which contains the C implementation of __build_class__ still uses simply the first base. The "winner calculation" probably refers to the algorithm determining the proper metaclass in lines 1950-1976 of typeobject.c (in type_new). |
|