Message126883
| Author |
naguilera |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, loewis, michael.foord, naguilera, ned.deily, rhettinger, ronaldoussoren, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年01月23日.11:35:54 |
| SpamBayes Score |
6.5566164e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<DF0623EE-9C28-44A7-A6F0-1B224BAED2ED@santafe-conicet.gov.ar> |
| In-reply-to |
<1295768014.87.0.414889181595.issue10973@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On 23 Jan 2011, at 04:33, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Georg Brandl <georg@python.org> added the comment:
>
>> I disagree. There aren't really "64-bit users" on OSX, thanks to fat
>> binaries. So if starting IDLE would start a 32-bit interpreter, users
>> likely won't even notice. If they do notice, they can still run in
>> 64-bit mode from the command line.
> Okay, fair enough. If it's easy to always let IDLE run in 32-bit mode, I'm fine with that. What about other programs using tkinter?
In a previous message (http://bugs.python.org/issue10973#msg126868) I mentioned that I get warning messages with the 32-bit version of 3.1.3 in OSX 10.6. Would a 32-bit version for 3.2 correct these? |
|