Message126870
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, loewis, michael.foord, naguilera, ned.deily, rhettinger, ronaldoussoren, vstinner |
| Date |
2011年01月23日.01:59:32 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.0406981e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4D3B8B82.7060500@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1295735396.78.0.871019955973.issue10973@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Hmm. It seems better to me to accept this bug (and document it, and
> point out that it isn't Python's fault) than depriving 64-bit users
> of IDLE, or (even worse) of tkinter.
I disagree. There aren't really "64-bit users" on OSX, thanks to fat
binaries. So if starting IDLE would start a 32-bit interpreter, users
likely won't even notice. If they do notice, they can still run in
64-bit mode from the command line.
In my experience with fat python builds on OSX, it's typically better
to prefer 32-bit mode, anyway, as extension modules often don't come
in a fat version, but often in 32-bit mode only. |
|