Message126038
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, docs@python, georg.brandl, napik, techtonik |
| Date |
2011年01月11日.21:27:23 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.8451859e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<AANLkTikYbXX+pm=PRZBRJZkb02kh-2oqvPpFnR2aXF5F@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<AANLkTi=t2548FPZQQTYbyyxWGJdoeB4EmYR9Esu=tuea@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:15 PM, anatoly techtonik
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> To summarize: What is wrong with my previous proposal if we remove t
> from params?
Not much is wrong with it. If it would come in a form of a patch and
without typos or mark-up mistakes, I or another committer would
probably apply it as an incremental improvement. However, given that
additional effort is needed to apply your suggestion, I would rather
wait until a better solution is available. Specifically, I don like
the duplication of time.localtime().tm_isdst recipe in daylight and
altzone. Also, these variables should really be grouped together in
the docs. I would like this to be done before a committer spends
time proofreading, fixing reST markup and committing the change. |
|