Message124961
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
draghuram, eric.araujo, ethan.furman, mrabarnett, ncoghlan, pitrou, poke, rhettinger, steven.daprano |
| Date |
2010年12月31日.10:38:51 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.6798522e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1293791928.3680.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1293754066.44.0.150961801844.issue6210@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Le vendredi 31 décembre 2010 à 00:07 +0000, Patrick W. a écrit :
> Patrick W. <poke@BornToLaugh.de> added the comment:
>
> Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) at 2010年12月30日 18:32 (UTC)
> > We are talking about context, not cause.
>
> Yes, but - as said before - obviously the cause takes a higher
> precedence than context (otherwise it wouldn't show a context message
> when you explicitely set that). So when *explicitely* setting the
> cause to `None`, it should use the cause `None` and ignore the
> context, and as such display nothing.
It looks quite unintuitive to me, though. |
|