Message124841
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, asksol, brian.curtin, elprans, eric.araujo, exarkun, flub, giampaolo.rodola, iElectric, lericson, loewis, marcelo_fernandez, piro, serverhorror, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年12月29日.02:06:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.0123569e-12 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4D1A97B5.1020204@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1293585806.86.0.446616973651.issue5672@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Just for the record, I was about to try to do this, when I realized that exposing prctl requires expecting a variable number of arguments with variable types.
> It turns out providing a Python wrapper for such a kind of C API is just a pain.
> There's an implementation though, handling 2 args only (instead of 5):
> https://github.com/seveas/python-prctl/blob/master/_prctlmodule.c#L9
> Considering that this also Linux-only, I don't think it really worths the effort.
It's actually simpler than you think: I don't think any of the existing
controls uses arg4 and arg5. PR_MCE_KILL uses arg3, though. prctl is
really a set of system calls, and should be wrapped as such: each
control needs to be supported specifically. However, several of them
are similar, i.e. take either no argument, or have
Whether it's worth supporting it, I don't know. I stand by my original
proposition: if somebody would contribute this, I'd be in favor of
including it. I'm unlikely to write it on my own from scratch, though. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年12月29日 02:06:48 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, exarkun, amaury.forgeotdarc, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, flub, piro, serverhorror, iElectric, eric.araujo, marcelo_fernandez, elprans, brian.curtin, asksol, lericson |
| 2010年12月29日 02:06:46 | loewis | link | issue5672 messages |
| 2010年12月29日 02:06:46 | loewis | create |
|