Message124837
| Author |
giampaolo.rodola |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, asksol, brian.curtin, elprans, eric.araujo, exarkun, flub, giampaolo.rodola, iElectric, lericson, loewis, marcelo_fernandez, piro, serverhorror, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年12月29日.01:23:22 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.0711489e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1293585806.86.0.446616973651.issue5672@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> If somebody would provide a patch that adds prctl to the posix module,
> that would be fine with me - we have a long tradition of exposing all
> available system calls if somebody wants them.
Just for the record, I was about to try to do this, when I realized that exposing prctl requires expecting a variable number of arguments with variable types.
It turns out providing a Python wrapper for such a kind of C API is just a pain.
There's an implementation though, handling 2 args only (instead of 5):
https://github.com/seveas/python-prctl/blob/master/_prctlmodule.c#L9
Considering that this also Linux-only, I don't think it really worths the effort. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年12月29日 01:23:27 | giampaolo.rodola | set | recipients:
+ giampaolo.rodola, loewis, exarkun, amaury.forgeotdarc, vstinner, flub, piro, serverhorror, iElectric, eric.araujo, marcelo_fernandez, elprans, brian.curtin, asksol, lericson |
| 2010年12月29日 01:23:26 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messageid: <1293585806.86.0.446616973651.issue5672@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年12月29日 01:23:22 | giampaolo.rodola | link | issue5672 messages |
| 2010年12月29日 01:23:22 | giampaolo.rodola | create |
|