Message124322
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, ebfe, ggenellina, gladed, r.david.murray, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年12月18日.21:43:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.0181324e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1292708606.95.0.282799375917.issue4871@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
What about bytearray? Apparently that works pre-patch for at least read, though setpassword rejects it via an assertion.
Also, the error message should be "expected bytes" rather than "bytes expected". Don't ask me why, that's just the way it is normally done, so the other order sounds weird to this English speaker's ear. Otherwise the py3k patch looks good and tests correctly for me. |
|