Message123513
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
hpk, michael.foord, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2010年12月07日.02:08:29 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.7686692e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1291687710.9.0.400770730617.issue10548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I have to say that it would never have occurred to me to assert a pre or post condition and an expected failure where I expected the pre or post condition to fail, but if you've got a real use case and it would make the code simpler, I suppose I have no serious objection. I don't use expected failure myself. Just make sure you document it well, since it is not a behavior I would expect when using expected failure, and I'm sure there will be others like me. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年12月07日 02:08:30 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, michael.foord, hpk |
| 2010年12月07日 02:08:30 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1291687710.9.0.400770730617.issue10548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年12月07日 02:08:29 | r.david.murray | link | issue10548 messages |
| 2010年12月07日 02:08:29 | r.david.murray | create |
|