Message123493
| Author |
hpk |
| Recipients |
hpk, michael.foord, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2010年12月06日.19:06:13 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0051483493 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1291662375.96.0.872764569012.issue10548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
FWIW i tend to agree and would probably prefer setup/teardown to result in an error rather than be subsumed in an expected-to-fail marked test. I guess if one regards setup/teardown as a place to implement pre/post-conditions than the changes suggested by Michael make more sense. I'd like to see a more "real" use case / user than the abstract case provided here. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年12月06日 19:06:16 | hpk | set | recipients:
+ hpk, r.david.murray, michael.foord |
| 2010年12月06日 19:06:15 | hpk | set | messageid: <1291662375.96.0.872764569012.issue10548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年12月06日 19:06:13 | hpk | link | issue10548 messages |
| 2010年12月06日 19:06:13 | hpk | create |
|