Message123039
| Author |
orsenthil |
| Recipients |
catlee, davide.rizzo, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, jhylton, orsenthil, pitrou, rcoyner, rhettinger, xuanji |
| Date |
2010年12月02日.02:23:18 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00033365103 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<20101202022312.GB1873@rubuntu> |
| In-reply-to |
<1291215416.28.0.0920358124785.issue3243@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:56:56PM +0000, Xuanji Li wrote:
> orsenthil: Hi, i don't quite understand why iter() needs to be
> called explicitly on data? As I understand it, if data is an
> iterable then you can use a for loop on it directly.
>
The reasoning I followed was, data is an "Iterable" (a collection) and
you get an "Iterator" by passing via iter(). And you send the items by
looping over the iterator.
Honestly, I am not sure if iter is needed here too. I thought it was
not needed too, when you determine it is an Iterable and iterate over
it using the for loop. But I kept the iter() method just to create an
instance and send it.
Antoine, which would be the correct/ better? |
|