Message122851
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, ezio.melotti, lemburg, loewis |
| Date |
2010年11月29日.19:04:54 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.9960036e-16 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<AANLkTi=SbWju7mAuCekMrA5uk5ey9YFQGYmv129eMGd1@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<4CF3F0EA.3090308@egenix.com> |
| Content |
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
>
> I consider this a bug (which is why I added Python 2.7 to the list
> of versions), since those code points need to be mapped to decimal
> and digit as well (see the references I posted; and compare ).
>
I don't disagree. However using Unicode 5.2.0 instead of the latest
6.0.0 may be considered a bug as well. The practical issue is whether
to maintain two separate versions of Tools/unicode for 3.x and 2.7 or
merge 3.x changes back to 2.7 and support 3.x using 2to3. Another
option is to simply use only 2.7 (or only 3.x) with Tools/unicode and
maintain control the differences between 2.7 and 3.x using a command
line switch. |
|