Message122198
| Author |
jonny |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, jonny, loewis, rpetrov |
| Date |
2010年11月23日.07:23:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.0498963e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1290497011.78.0.698724178551.issue10504@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Why exactly are you skeptical? Because it doesn't fix everything in one go? The other changes are also minimal (I'm not even sure if it requires more source changes, maybe I have just to get my #defines right). If you prefer to see a single patch which you can reproduce to fix MinGW compilation completely, I'm willing to do that.
Given that 2.7 is supposed to be a long time support version, I really think people should have a chance to use MinGW. The patch is trivial, but figuring out everything from the compiler error messages can be brain bending. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年11月23日 07:23:31 | jonny | set | recipients:
+ jonny, loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, rpetrov |
| 2010年11月23日 07:23:31 | jonny | set | messageid: <1290497011.78.0.698724178551.issue10504@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年11月23日 07:23:26 | jonny | link | issue10504 messages |
| 2010年11月23日 07:23:26 | jonny | create |
|