Message121988
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ingo.janssen, mark.dickinson, rbp |
| Date |
2010年11月21日.20:55:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.027060581 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<AANLkTin0wbdz2W1GzZW_7aozqS-T=oBf=Nc-VuQ1N-vD@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1290372534.23.0.372628773275.issue10427@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> Well, if all that's wanted is for hour==24 to be legal on input, with the datetime object
> itself being automatically normalized at creation time, then the choices seem simple: ..
What about time objects? If we take the "normalized at creation time"
approach, time(24) may still be disallowed. |
|