Message121491
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
akuchling, belopolsky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2010年11月18日.20:12:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.3560273e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<AANLkTinKQnOBxBti_=JM3Bub-H-kV2B0ExhyROrqJicQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<AANLkTikmBxw=7C0c7ruS04180UNAkUZPi+GYwPjZE+=C@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
>> I really think of them as hex or hexadecimal digits, just as 0-9 are decimal, not base 10 digits.
>>
>
> I am fine with "hexadecimal" here. I did not like "hex".
If you think about it, "hexadecimal digit" is a twice oxymoron because
both "decimal" and "digit" imply base 10. :-) It does look like the
most widely used term, nevertheless. |
|