Message121449
| Author |
rhettinger |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, rhettinger, stribb, terry.reedy, thomaslee |
| Date |
2010年11月18日.09:54:57 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.6048083e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1290074099.12.0.562739923979.issue4113@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Looks like a reasonable proposal, but coding this in C is a chore.
It's not that bad. Most C code is a bit of a chore compared to Python but it really doesn't take much to write a C equivalent of: "functools.partial(%r, %s)" % (self.func, ', '.join(repr(a) for a in self.args)
> How hard/inefficient would it be to have 99% of partial
> coded in C and one stub in functools.py?
Let's not do this. There is too little benefit to warrant going down the path of splitting the code across two langauges. |
|