Message121439
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, docs@python, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, ron_adam |
| Date |
2010年11月18日.05:06:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00020483042 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1290056802.56.0.308564936698.issue10446@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> The point of this bug report was that 3.x pydoc was sending users to
> 2.7, which is clearly unacceptable.
Agreed. My reply about x.y vs. x.y+1 was a reaction to your patch, not a misunderstanding of the point of this bug.
> As long as documentation bug fixes are backported to maintenance
> branches, I don't see an advantage in consulting 3.2 when developing for 3.1.
I prefer version-specific docs too, but the thread on python-dev seemed to show I was not in the majority.
> Now, I keep this issue open to decide if we should backport this to
> 2.7 where this is not a bug (yet), but will be when default docs
> switch to 3.x. What do you think?
+1 for backporting. |
|