Message121394
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, docs@python, eric.araujo, georg.brandl |
| Date |
2010年11月18日.00:27:47 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.1836941e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1290040083.28.0.103275818691.issue10446@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Looks good. Some remarks:
1) I assume you have checked that this code does not produce two newlines (one in the string, one from the print function or write method):
+[snip], consult the module reference at the location listed above.
+""")
2) "If you can suggest some simple test for pointing to 'dev' instead of 'release/X.Y'" → sys.version_info[3] != 'final'
3) People seem to go the the most recent version of the docs, not the release-specific version (I haven’t found the python-dev thread about that, maybe you remember it). The version{add,chang}ed directives help adjust the doc for older versions. So, are you sure it’s useful to make the links release-specific? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年11月18日 00:28:03 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, georg.brandl, belopolsky, docs@python |
| 2010年11月18日 00:28:03 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1290040083.28.0.103275818691.issue10446@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年11月18日 00:27:47 | eric.araujo | link | issue10446 messages |
| 2010年11月18日 00:27:47 | eric.araujo | create |
|