Message121151
| Author |
brett.cannon |
| Recipients |
alex, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, dmalcolm, jhylton, nnorwitz, pitrou, rhettinger, sdahlbac, thomaslee, titanstar |
| Date |
2010年11月13日.18:21:54 |
| SpamBayes Score |
6.426165e-11 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1289672516.22.0.381319619959.issue10399@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
While I have nothing to say directly about the inline optimization, I do have some stuff to say about moving to AST optimizations.
First, doing in Python is a good thing. It not only makes prototyping easier, but it allows other VMs to use the optimizations w/o having to re-implement themselves.
Second, the symtable pass does need to eventually get exposed (most likely as an optional pass one can do to an AST). I am actually in the middle of an AST-heavy project that will end up wanting the symbol table info as well.
Third, for that Graphviz output, was anything special required? If so, I would toss the code into Tools for others to benefit from. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年11月13日 18:21:56 | brett.cannon | set | recipients:
+ brett.cannon, jhylton, nnorwitz, rhettinger, belopolsky, sdahlbac, titanstar, pitrou, thomaslee, benjamin.peterson, alex, dmalcolm |
| 2010年11月13日 18:21:56 | brett.cannon | set | messageid: <1289672516.22.0.381319619959.issue10399@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年11月13日 18:21:54 | brett.cannon | link | issue10399 messages |
| 2010年11月13日 18:21:54 | brett.cannon | create |
|