Message120886
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, brett.cannon, eli.bendersky, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2010年11月09日.18:17:48 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0002641495 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1289326669.46.0.316850126015.issue10371@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Looks good in a cursory reading. I presume trace test still passes.
If you change the signature of the renamed functions, that would break the current wrappings. Would you use new private functions with different names, or change the wrappings where possible? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年11月09日 18:17:49 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, brett.cannon, belopolsky, eli.bendersky |
| 2010年11月09日 18:17:49 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1289326669.46.0.316850126015.issue10371@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年11月09日 18:17:48 | terry.reedy | link | issue10371 messages |
| 2010年11月09日 18:17:48 | terry.reedy | create |
|