Message120674
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
brian.curtin, casevh, eric.smith, jjconti, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, skrah |
| Date |
2010年11月07日.12:30:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00026087445 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<AANLkTinwzzie6-4Fxd2tjV-3oPJCmK_fLv8aN-mxF2Az@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1288754888.21.0.493810987272.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Case Van Horsen <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Has the cdecimal branch kept up with the hash value changes in 3.2?
Not sure; that's a question for Stefan.
> Is there a still a chance that cdecimal could be merged into 3.2?
A chance, yes; the major need is for someone with time to do a full
review. (I'm afraid that's not me, right now.) |
|