homepage

> Thanks for your comment; it is a very valid point to consider.
> However, as a vector-based implementation is roughly three to four
> times faster than what the current API can provide by design (reduced
> overhead and GIL-relaxation not included), I may disagree with it.
I fear that this kind of optimization is a moving target. If some CPU
architecture gains hardware support for cryptographic hashes, OpenSSL
will support it and be much faster than Python's parallel version.
> I'm willing to make a proposal (read: patch) if you and the other
> overlords have enough confidence in this API-change and it has a
> chance to get submitted.
If the only advantage is some speedup on parallel hashing of
many-small-strings, I don't think a new API is warranted for such a
specialized use case.