Message120412
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, exarkun, hfuru, loewis, pitrou |
| Date |
2010年11月04日.14:50:06 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.599232e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1288882208.61.0.379860480119.issue10311@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> ["this" = only saving/restoring errno when needed]
> True, but practically nothing is officially safe to do in signal
> handlers, so it's good to avoid code which can be avoided there.
> If one can be bothered to, that is.
I think it is extremely unlikely that mutating errno in a signal handler is unsafe (after all, the library functions called from that handler can mutate errno too: that's the whole point of the patch IIUC). Adding some configure machinery for this seems unwarranted to me. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年11月04日 14:50:08 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, exarkun, amaury.forgeotdarc, hfuru |
| 2010年11月04日 14:50:08 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1288882208.61.0.379860480119.issue10311@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年11月04日 14:50:06 | pitrou | link | issue10311 messages |
| 2010年11月04日 14:50:06 | pitrou | create |
|