Message120355
| Author |
rhettinger |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, michael.foord, rhettinger |
| Date |
2010年11月03日.23:33:19 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.0296664e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1288827200.55.0.716619606448.issue10242@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I'd be inclined to insert a check that falls back
> to the "unorderable_list_difference" approach in
> the case where "expected != sorted(reversed(expected))".
Too fragile and subtle. The method need to be absolutely straight-forward. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年11月03日 23:33:20 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, ezio.melotti, michael.foord |
| 2010年11月03日 23:33:20 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1288827200.55.0.716619606448.issue10242@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年11月03日 23:33:19 | rhettinger | link | issue10242 messages |
| 2010年11月03日 23:33:19 | rhettinger | create |
|