Message120214
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
georg.brandl, jyasskin, kristjan.jonsson, pitrou |
| Date |
2010年11月02日.11:29:02 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.1039584e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1288697339.3549.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1288657753.33.0.884410299435.issue10260@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I spent some time thinking of a name. I tried wait_predicate and
> predicate_wait, but wait_for seemed natural. Any other ideas?
> How about wait_until_true?
wait_for is ok IMO.
> My original method had this as a free function, but I moved it into
> the Condition because I could see no other kind of primitive that
> would use it. I agree that it is unfortunate to pull what is
> essentially a utility function into the Condition variable, so I am
> leaning towards keeping it a module function.
I'm not sure I see the point. It's an operation on a Condition variable,
so it's natural to have it as a Condition method. A module function
would feel rather weird. |
|