Message120043
| Author |
karstenw |
| Recipients |
karstenw, lars.gustaebel |
| Date |
2010年10月31日.11:58:44 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0002690848 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1288526326.0.0.599745921491.issue10261@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Yes, I'm on 2.6. I checked the Python 3.x tarfile just for this one line in TarFile.next():
self.members.append(tarinfo)
to conclude it would have the same problem.
Reducing 2.5gb memory usage as measured in my particular case by 60%, still leaves 1.5gb ram burned which is too much on a 32-bit 2gb ram machine.
My solution was to comment out that line which worked perfectly for my case but may not be the solution for the module. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年10月31日 11:58:46 | karstenw | set | recipients:
+ karstenw, lars.gustaebel |
| 2010年10月31日 11:58:46 | karstenw | set | messageid: <1288526326.0.0.599745921491.issue10261@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年10月31日 11:58:44 | karstenw | link | issue10261 messages |
| 2010年10月31日 11:58:44 | karstenw | create |
|