Message119746
| Author |
Retro |
| Recipients |
Retro, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, ixokai, pitrou |
| Date |
2010年10月28日.00:29:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.6047473e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<AANLkTinEgzPFoaTSWbhf7ayMYm0J+SMGVUY5s_LO2f6P@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1288224703.73.0.483830847858.issue7351@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
No alias. Be stubborn and let the stdlib die in inconsistency.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Stephen Hansen <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:
>
> Stephen Hansen <me+python@ixokai.io <me%2Bpython@ixokai.io>> added the
> comment:
>
> You may "not care" about backwards compatibility, but introducing a
> breaking change in 3.2 for mere style-conformity is not OK, IMO. If the
> patcher insists on it being a breaking change, it should be rejected.
>
> FWIW, this casing is sufficiently bizarre and inconsistent in the module
> itself, that it seems clearly wrong and likely to produce difficulties for
> people using it-- so although I'm not upgrading to Python3 anytime soon, I'd
> really like to change my code to be BadZipFile when I do, so I'd be +1 with
> an alias. :)
>
> ----------
> nosy: +ixokai
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7351>
> _______________________________________
> |
| Files |
|---|
| File name |
Uploaded |
|
unnamed
|
Retro,
2010年10月28日.00:29:51
|
|