Message119557
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, Garen, belopolsky, bretthoerner, chrismiles, danchr, dmalcolm, giampaolo.rodola, glyph, jbaker, jcea, laca, mjw, movement, pitrou, rhettinger, robert.kern, ronaldoussoren, sirg3, techtonik, twleung, wsanchez |
| Date |
2010年10月25日.16:15:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.137018e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<AANLkTim8uyP8mM6ph=N94-4iQBOp10L6TAiz1wm=Foe8@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1288022586.34.0.216868175839.issue4111@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
2010年10月25日 Jesús Cea Avión <report@bugs.python.org>:
..
> Another question: I am not able to decide between Sun/Apple style, or breaking dtrace scripts
> compatibility completely. Anybody has an opinion about this?. Is this actually important?. Are
> there so many legacy dtrace scripts out there?.
>
I would say compatibility with Sun/Apple probes should not stand in
the way of implementing this in cpython. Of course familiarity to
existing users is a consideration, but in cases where self-consistency
can be improved, I don't think we should be overly concerned about
legacy scripts. I would estimate that 90% of future users will never
have used either Sun or Apple probes, 9% will have used Apple and 1%
Sun. (This is completely unscientific guess, of course.) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年10月25日 16:15:53 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky, rhettinger, jcea, ronaldoussoren, pitrou, wsanchez, movement, techtonik, giampaolo.rodola, glyph, bretthoerner, laca, twleung, jbaker, robert.kern, sirg3, chrismiles, danchr, dmalcolm, mjw, Garen, BreamoreBoy |
| 2010年10月25日 16:15:50 | belopolsky | link | issue4111 messages |
| 2010年10月25日 16:15:49 | belopolsky | create |
|