Message117958
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, barry, pitrou, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2010年10月04日.15:24:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.8602822e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1286205884.3178.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1286205521.06.0.950416103352.issue6302@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I agree that it makes sense to have consistent types in the output.
> As for whether to add a new method or fix the existing one, I'm a bit
> torn, but I'd probably opt for fixing the existing function rather
> than adding a new one, just because I think there are few Python 3
> applications out there that are counting on the old behavior. (I
> could be wrong though ;).
The point of a new method is to return the header as a human-readable
string, rather than a list of tuples. It has added value besides leaving
the old method alone ;) |
|