Message117666
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, eric.smith, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2010年09月29日.22:09:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00035988304 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1285798167.3194.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1285797358.89.0.615919758335.issue9873@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> The primary reason for supporting ASCII compatible bytes directly is
> specifically to avoid the encoding and decoding overhead associated
> with the translation to unicode text.
I think it's quite misguided. latin1 encoding and decoding is blindingly
fast (on the order of 1GB/s. here). Unless you have multi-megabyte URLs,
you won't notice any overhead. |
|