Message117362
| Author |
janglin |
| Recipients |
effbot, flox, janglin, loewis, pitrou |
| Date |
2010年09月25日.13:07:06 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.873313e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1285420028.44.0.844166355961.issue9783@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Martin is correct about this patch.
> In cases where we really can't propagate Py_ssize_t to (e.g.
> XML_Parse), we need to check for an int overflow, and raise
> an exception if it does overflow.
Is this an appropriate approach?
int
PySize_AsInt(Py_ssize_t value)
{
if (value > (Py_ssize_t)INT_MAX || value < (Py_ssize_t)INT_MIN) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError,
"Size value can not be represented as an integer");
}
return (int)value;
}
I would only define this when sizeof(Py_ssize_t) > sizeof(int) of course. In other cases it would be a macro that just evaluates to value.
I would most likely need an unsigned version as well (although not for this particular issue).
This code could be used in many C modules. Where in the Python code base should such functions be placed? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年09月25日 13:07:08 | janglin | set | recipients:
+ janglin, loewis, effbot, pitrou, flox |
| 2010年09月25日 13:07:08 | janglin | set | messageid: <1285420028.44.0.844166355961.issue9783@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年09月25日 13:07:07 | janglin | link | issue9783 messages |
| 2010年09月25日 13:07:06 | janglin | create |
|