Message117070
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, ajaksu2, loewis, mdr0, nnorwitz, sable, tim.peters, wheelrl |
| Date |
2010年09月21日.15:28:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.762866e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4C98CF03.5000606@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1285080457.37.0.19793751033.issue678250@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Should flush be modified to do nothing in this case or should the unit test be updated?
Tim is suggesting that flush should indeed become a noop. Since nobody
else speaking in favor of it being an error, I guess this is the way to
go: flush, on an ACCESS_COPY file, does nothing, and the test is fine
as it stands. |
|