Message116316
| Author |
amaury.forgeotdarc |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, daniel.urban, georg.brandl, pwerneck, rodsenra, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2010年09月13日.15:35:11 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0010756139 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1284392112.56.0.815651674404.issue1294232@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
What also worries me is the difference between the "class" statement and the type() function.
class M_A(type):
def __new__(mcls, name, bases, ns):
print('M_A.__new__', mcls, name, bases)
return super().__new__(mcls, name, bases, ns)
class M_B(M_A):
def __new__(mcls, name, bases, ns):
print('M_B.__new__', mcls, name, bases)
return super().__new__(mcls, name, bases, ns)
class A(metaclass=M_A): pass
class B(metaclass=M_B): pass
class C(A, B): pass
D = type('D', (A, B), {})
The construction of C and D won't print the same messages. |
|