Message116049
| Author |
Red HamsterX |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, Red HamsterX, ajaksu2, amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.araujo, pitrou, r.david.murray, sanxiyn |
| Date |
2010年09月10日.22:08:01 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.382191e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1284156483.37.0.746233698078.issue1466065@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I agree that it does look like RFC 3548 implicitly denies the use of \r and \n. A few *very* simple tests also makes it look like ommitting them breaks nothing, but we'd need to add a test that includes them before applying the patch.
Other than that, I agree with everything and find the email6 notes intruiging.
Would you like me to update the patch, or do you want to do it? |
|