Message114951
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
akitada, anthonybaxter, eric.araujo, tarek |
| Date |
2010年08月26日.00:49:51 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.22954e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1282783793.66.0.150950019347.issue1109659@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Being able to write a global option after a command name seems a nice feature to me, and the implementation should be straightforward: The base Command class already adds some options like help to each subclass, it’s just a matter of adding verbose, quiet and dry-run and adapting distribution.
no-user-cfg would have to be special-cased: Giving this option to one command would just pass it to the Distribution instance. Supporting per-command no-user-cfg would be overly complicated and not really useful. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年08月26日 00:49:53 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, anthonybaxter, tarek, akitada |
| 2010年08月26日 00:49:53 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1282783793.66.0.150950019347.issue1109659@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年08月26日 00:49:52 | eric.araujo | link | issue1109659 messages |
| 2010年08月26日 00:49:51 | eric.araujo | create |
|