Message112915
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
flox, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou, tim.peters |
| Date |
2010年08月04日.22:45:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.1523826e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1280961906.45.0.854818205196.issue477863@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> - use test.script_helper.run_python rather than rolling your own
> run_command (or, at least, just make run_command a thin wrapper around
> run_python). I've been trying to trim down the number of different
> ways the test suite launches interpreter subprocesses for testing
> purposes, and script_helper also does a bit of extra cleanup to try to
> eliminate false alarms regarding reference leaks.
After a quick grep, it seems script_helper is really in the minority
(it's only used in three test files) while ad hoc calls to subprocess
with sys.executable are all over the place. I'd rather open a separate
feature request for that new script_helper function than convert all
uses of subprocess in this issue.
> - update the description of gc.DEBUG_UNCOLLECTABLE in the docs to
> specifically mention that the complete list of uncollectable objects
> will also be printed at interpreter shutdown.
Ah, indeed. Thanks! |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年08月04日 22:45:06 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, gvanrossum, tim.peters, ncoghlan, flox |
| 2010年08月04日 22:45:06 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1280961906.45.0.854818205196.issue477863@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年08月04日 22:45:05 | pitrou | link | issue477863 messages |
| 2010年08月04日 22:45:05 | pitrou | create |
|