Message 112738 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	r.david.murray
Recipients	ggenellina, guettli, hoffman, news1234, pakal, r.david.murray, ysj.ray
Date	2010年08月04日.02:32:57
SpamBayes Score	4.974003e-09
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1280889182.53.0.800988810141.issue1553375@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Updated patch with unit tests and docs. I realized that I'd forgotten to test chained exceptions. It looks like when the Interpreter prints a traceback all the exceptions in the chain are printed fully, which makes sense. Adopting that strategy for this patch simplified it into three lines (the signature change and an if/print in the loop). I'm pretty satisfied with this patch. I have two questions: should the 'fullstack' option really be implemented in print_tb instead? And is there a better name for the option? Would just 'full' be acceptable?

Content

Updated patch with unit tests and docs. I realized that I'd forgotten to test chained exceptions. It looks like when the Interpreter prints a traceback all the exceptions in the chain are printed fully, which makes sense. Adopting that strategy for this patch simplified it into three lines (the signature change and an if/print in the loop).
I'm pretty satisfied with this patch. I have two questions: should the 'fullstack' option really be implemented in print_tb instead? And is there a better name for the option? Would just 'full' be acceptable?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010年08月04日 02:33:03	r.david.murray	set	recipients: + r.david.murray, guettli, hoffman, ggenellina, pakal, news1234, ysj.ray
2010年08月04日 02:33:02	r.david.murray	set	messageid: <1280889182.53.0.800988810141.issue1553375@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010年08月04日 02:33:00	r.david.murray	link	issue1553375 messages
2010年08月04日 02:33:00	r.david.murray	create

homepage