Message111819
| Author |
lemburg |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, amaury.forgeotdarc, ezio.melotti, lemburg, loewis, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年07月28日.14:54:27 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0015131331 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4C5044A1.9000907@egenix.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1280328646.6.0.169230278841.issue8776@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
STINNER Victor wrote:
>
> STINNER Victor <victor.stinner@haypocalc.com> added the comment:
>
>> Using that approach would work on POSIX systems.
>
> As os.environb, I think that sys.argv should not exist on Windows.
>
>> Another problem I see is synchronizing the two
>
> os.environ and os.environb are synchronized. It would be possible to do the same with sys.argv and sys.argvb. The implement would be simplier because it's just a list, not a dict.
+1 on adding sys.argvb for systems that use char* in main(). |
|