Message111808
| Author |
lemburg |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, ezio.melotti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, ron_adam, ysj.ray |
| Date |
2010年07月28日.13:44:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0004496555 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4C503454.2030801@egenix.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1280322700.64.0.489091395657.issue7330@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Ray.Allen wrote:
>
> Ray.Allen <ysj.ray@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> I feel it's not proper to allow the width restrict on types %S, %R, %A. These types correspond to PyObject_Str(), PyObject_Repr, PyObject_ASCII() respectively, the results of them are usually a complete string representation of a object. If you put a width restriction on the string, it's likely that the result string is intercepted and is of no complete meaning. If you really want to put a width restriction on the result, you can use %s instead, with one or two more lines to get the corresponding char* from the object.
I agree with that, but don't feel strongly about not allowing this
use case.
If it's easy to support, why not have it ? Otherwise, I'd be +1 on
adding a check and raise an error in case a width modifier is used
with these markers. |
|