Message111716
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, cgwalters, cvrebert, dexen, eric.araujo, fperez, mark.dickinson, mcepl, nwerneck, r.david.murray, vstinner |
| Date |
2010年07月27日.18:52:43 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.003650401 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<AANLkTik8iOxxea+N4bErE-kxEH7cptHi-mcAZjGYWW9H@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1280255213.08.0.964222158358.issue1170@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Fernando Perez <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> Yes, sorry that I failed to mention the example I gave applies only to 2.x, not to 3.x.
Why do you expect shlex to work with unicode in 2.x? The
documentation clearly says that the argument should be a string.
Supporting unicode is not an unreasonable RFE, but won't be considered
for 2.x anymore.
What's your take on accepting bytes in 3.x? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年07月27日 18:52:46 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky, mark.dickinson, vstinner, dexen, benjamin.peterson, cgwalters, mcepl, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, nwerneck, cvrebert, fperez |
| 2010年07月27日 18:52:43 | belopolsky | link | issue1170 messages |
| 2010年07月27日 18:52:43 | belopolsky | create |
|