Message111651
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, eli.bendersky, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2010年07月26日.17:36:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.009017e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<AANLkTi=MnH2o8m8bbLdXAEjnHP7hp8+0s=zc4-32hu8s@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1280119765.6.0.405609709685.issue9315@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Eli Bendersky <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> This raises a question: should method names of classes come after the class names when appearing
> in a trace? Intuitively yes, but I want to investigate some more, probably by adding a couple more test
> cases where the traced functions are methods of objects rather than plain functions.
>
I want to agree, but finding the class name of the method may not be
trivial in 3.x because we don't have unbound methods anymore. Please
bring this up on python-dev. |
|