Message111054
| Author |
Alexander.Belopolsky |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, belopolsky, eli.bendersky, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2010年07月21日.13:36:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0008317151 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<ADEC5D92-4219-4694-B711-DA6C110AAEA0@gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1279718557.99.0.743035951432.issue9317@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Eli Bendersky <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:
>
> Eli Bendersky <eliben@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> <<<<
> Your new patch makes perfect sense, but can you check of regular
> python invocation uses runpy these days. If it does, it may make sense
> to include it in trace at least optionally.
>>>>>
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this. Could you please
> clarify?
>
Sorry, typing on the phone. s/of/if/ in my message above. What I mean
is that as far as I know, when you run a script from command line,
python loads it using functions in runpy. Arguably this means that
these functions should show up in coverage. |
|